Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Transitional Credit

THYAGARAJAN KALYANASUNDARAM

Dear Experts,

One of my clients has taken the VAT credit in GSTR-3B in the month of July 2017 instead of taking the credit through by filing TRAN-1 form. This credit belonging to VAT Credit against the Export of Goods. Presently, my client is under Central Jurisdiction, and the audit team came for Audit and found this error to the tune of ₹ 30 Lakhs. Accordingly, my client has excessive credit in the GST, based on that coercive action my client has reversed the credit under protest.

Now, my client has received the SCN from the department and asking for Interest for the wrong availment of transition credit.

My query is, can I file a writ petition before the court and direct the authority to accept the fresh TRAN-1 and allow the credit. And also waive the Interest u/s 50 of the CGST Act.

Please suggest me and also, kindly share suitable citations in order to overcome this issue.

Thanks in Advance.

Client Faces Interest Demand for Mistaken VAT Credit Claim; Experts Suggest Procedural Error, Advise Caution with Legal Action A client mistakenly claimed VAT credit through GSTR-3B instead of the required TRAN-1 form, resulting in an audit finding of excessive credit of 30 Lakhs. The client reversed the credit under protest but received a Show Cause Notice (SCN) demanding interest for the incorrect claim. Experts suggest this is a procedural error, not a substantive one, and advise exhausting departmental remedies before filing a writ petition. Some experts recommend citing favorable case laws if pursuing legal action. The client is advised to proceed cautiously, considering the potential for delays and legal costs. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues