Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Reversal of ITC

Bibhu Tripathy

Dear experts,

From a real estate company Department sent a summons and asked some documents during Feb.19

The company had obtained completion certificate during May 2017 and accumulated ITC in the credit ledgers during 2017 -18 and 2018-19. After receipt of summons the company reversed the ITC IN financial documents. The credit could not be reversed in GSTR 3B due to non filing of return due to technical problems.

Department searched the premises during Aug, 19 and after seven days the return was filed and the credit was reversed from the accumulated ITC.

Department asking for interest on the ground that amendment in Sec. 50 does not apply to Rule 42 and the net cash liability concept is not applicable. Also they ask for penalty.

Is the Department correct in the said stand

Real estate firm disputes tax interest on unutilized ITC; experts debate applicability of Sections 50, 73, and 74 of CGST Act. A real estate company received a summons from the tax department regarding accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC) for 2017-18 and 2018-19. The company reversed the ITC in financial documents but faced technical issues filing the reversal in GSTR-3B. The department demanded interest and penalties, arguing that amendments in Section 50 do not apply to Rule 42, and the net cash liability concept is inapplicable. Experts in the forum debated whether interest is due on unutilized ITC, referencing Sections 73 and 74 of the CGST Act. Opinions varied on whether interest should apply, with some suggesting waiting for a show cause notice. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues