Dear Girish Ji,
The contractor is not issuing consignment note and the lien on the goods has not been transferred to the contractor. Hence, contractor may be anything other than GTA.
As the contractor is not doing the actual transportation, he may fall under 996793 – Other goods transport services n.e.c. And for GST the same will fall under Sl No. 11(ii) of the Notification 11/2017-CT (Rate), “(ii) Supporting services in transport other than (i) above”.
Who will be liable to pay GST under RCM for GTA Services?
See, this might be contentious. In my view, as per the explanation of NN 13/2017-CT(Rate), it has two conditions to decide - (i) The person who pays or (ii) The person who is liable to pay. So, even the person who is liable to pay may be called as ‘recipient’. In your case, the company is liable to pay and hence they are the recipient for discharging GST under RCM. The relevant extract of the explanation hereinbelow:
(a)The person who pays or is liable to pay freight for the transportation of goods by road in goods carriage, located in the taxable territory shall be treated as the person who receives the service for the purpose of this notification
Your query: -
For the sake of arguing you may call the contractor as the recipient for discharging GST under RCM. Because the contractor is paying the freight [‘The person who pays’]. As the recipient definition is extremely narrow under the notification. In such a business model, the contractor will pay 5% RCM, then raise an invoice and charge 18%. ITC is available subject to Chapter V.
2nd Model – The company pays 5% under RCM and the contractor raises GST invoice for his services under 996793 and charge 18%. In addition to the GST invoice, the contractor may raise commercial invoice [contractor service and freight charges].