Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 116924
Like 0 Bookmark

Show Cause Notice Issued Rejecting Refund Time Barred

Date 26 Dec 2020
Replies 4 Replies
Views 7409 Views
Asked by
Refund time bar: whether refiling after deficiency memos preserves limitation or is treated as a fresh barred application.
The issue is whether re-filing a refund application after receiving deficiency memos preserves or restarts the statutory limitation for refunds. Circular 125 para 8 is cited as excepting refilings following deficiency memos from chronological limitation, while Rule 90(3) of the CGST Rules treats rectified filings as fresh applications. Administrative rejections under RFD-06 citing time bar and missing attachments are reported, and judicial relief by writ petition is suggested to challenge the rule-based treatment of refilings. (AI Summary)

We filed our Refund Application in the time limit as notified in Circular 35/2020 & 55/2020. We were issued Deficiency Memo's 3 times on 14th, 15th and 16th day from date of filing our application. Finally we were issued acknowledgment RFD-02 for our application 4th time followed by a Show Cause Notice issued on 60th day rejecting our refund on the grounds of Time Barred.

We were informed earlier by an Officer that since our 1st application was filed within due time our refund wouldn't be time barred. Just wanted to know if there is any Notification or Circular issued in this regard to so that we can mention the same in our SCN.

4 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues