Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Input Tax Credit

VIGNESH

Sir. For the financial year 2018-2019 assessee failed to file GSTR 3B returns bur he has filed GSTR-1 and he has now filed GSTR-3B for all the pending months during Nov-2020 and claimed ITC, now AO is asking to Reverse the ITC bcs it is lapsed and cannot claim as date of Filing the said returns has ended. is there any binding section in favour of Assessee

Company Faces ITC Reversal for Late GSTR-3B Filing; Experts Debate Legal Interpretations and Deadline Compliance An individual from a private company sought advice on claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) for the financial year 2018-2019 after filing GSTR-3B returns late in November 2020. The Assessing Officer demanded the reversal of ITC, citing the expiration of the filing deadline. Various experts responded, noting that the deadline for claiming ITC was October 20, 2019, and that procedural lapses could not justify ITC claims. Some suggested contesting the matter, arguing that GSTR-3B might not be considered a return under certain legal interpretations. However, others emphasized that retrospective amendments and legal provisions limit the ability to claim time-barred credits. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
PAWAN KUMAR on Nov 27, 2020

Dear sir,

For FY 2018-19, the due date of claiming the ITC is 20.10.2019 , the date of filing GSTR-3B for Sept 2019 or the date of filing annual return whichever is earlier. no such option is available for claim if this time has been over.

KASTURI SETHI on Nov 28, 2020

The department's stand is correct. I support the views of Sh.Pawan Kumar Ji.

Chandani Nawalkha on Nov 28, 2020

. The ITC is a substantive right and cannot be curtailed due to a procedural lapse i.e. non filing of GSTR-3B in the instant case. Matter is disputable but can be suitably contested.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Nov 29, 2020

I agree with the views of experts.

CABIJENDERKUMAR BANSAL on Dec 1, 2020

Respected Sir

The provisions of Section 16(2)C has got the overriding effect as it start with not withstanding it contains under this SECTION thus the matter is require reconsideration by the department when SECTION 41 also allows the provisional credit. Further denial on the GST PORTAL is against the principle of natural justice when there are contradictions in provisions.

KASTURI SETHI on Dec 1, 2020

Section 41 of CGST does not allow time-bar credit. In my view, here the term, 'provisional credit' does not convey such message which you have arrived at.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Dec 1, 2020

I agree with the views of Sri Kasturi Sir. The word provisionally in Sec. 41 does not entitles a person to take time barred credit. It only states that person can take credit into his electronic credit ledger provisionally.

Alkesh Jani on Dec 2, 2020

Shri

I agree with the views expressed by our experts. However, the querist may contest the case on the ground that return GSTR-3B is not return under Section 39 as per the High Court Judgement and due date of Annual return for the period 2018-19 is 31st December, 2020.

KASTURI SETHI on Dec 2, 2020

After retrospective amendment, GSTR 3B is a return w.e.f. 1.7.17. If the party decides to opt for litigation, they will have to challenge legal validity of retrospective amendment. So the destination may prove a pipe dream.

 

Bhavika Chothani on Dec 11, 2020

In this case the last date of filing of GSTR-3B of September 2019 is already passed so ITC cannot be claimed now

PAWAN KUMAR on Dec 11, 2020

Dear sir,

Section 41CGST Act stipulates claim of itc which terms as provisional subject to restriction and conditions. it does not allow claim of itc on self assessment basis where the time of taking it has been lapsed. the logic behind this to ensure and meet the conditions of section 16 and matching concept of ITC in GSTR-2.

Kashish Gupta on Dec 14, 2020

Dear Vignesh,

Besides the views put forth by eminent experts, i would like to draw attention towards section 16(2)(d) of the Act. As per this condition, credit can be claimed once the return has been filed. Therefore, it apparently clarifies that credit is conditional upon filing of return under section 39.

Now coming to the aspect of time barredness, even if i keep section 16(4) aside, section 39(9) is still providing for the same. As per this sub-section, the time limit to correct any error or omission in the return is only upto the timelimit as provided by section 16(4) of the Act.

Now coming to the contention that GSTR-3B is not a return, which in my view is sustainable only for the period upto 10.11.2020, as on date the credit became barred by time for FY 2018-19. For the period before 10.11.2020, said credit has been contended to be not barred by time before various High Courts wherein notices have been issued to the Central Government and the final outcome is awaited. Therefore, it is my advise to take a strong legal advise for the input tax credit related to FY 2018-19 and proceed only if there is a strong case on facts.

Best Regards

Kashish Gupta

85108 06440

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues