Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

In processing of Income tax return, Long term capital gain u/s 112A is doubled

CABIJENDERKUMAR BANSAL

Dear All

I am facing a situation that similar type of addition is made in intimation of many Individual assessee having

Long term capital gain for AY 19-20 u/s 112A.

Cost of acquisition is take as per rule only without giving effect to the first and second proviso to section 48.

But in processing, intimation is taking double amount of such Long term capital gain.

I have applied for re-processing also, but again same problem persists.

Kindly help if any one has faced same situation.

Taxpayer Faces Issue with Doubled Long-Term Capital Gains for 2019-20; Section 112A Misapplication Suspected An individual is experiencing an issue with the processing of income tax returns where long-term capital gains under Section 112A are being doubled for assessment year 2019-20. The problem arises because the cost of acquisition is calculated according to the rule without considering the first and second proviso to Section 48, leading to incorrect intimation. Despite applying for re-processing, the issue remains unresolved. A respondent suggested filing a complaint with the Centralized Processing Center (CPC) in Bangalore for resolution. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues