Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Advance Authorization and GST

Kaustubh Karandikar

XYZ Ltd. Importing raw material under ‘Advance Authorization’. These goods will be directly sent to PQR (Supporting manufacturer) to manufacture finished goods. These finished goods will be purchased by XYZ from PQR where PQR will be charging 0.1% GST since XYZ will be exporting these goods as merchant exporter. XYZ will be showing these exports as fulfillment of export obligation against Advance authorization against which the raw material was imported by them. Is this transaction correct?

Advance authorization endorsement requirement ensures supporting manufacturer's name and joint liability for export obligation on shipping bill and authorization. Advance Authorization permits direct supply of imported inputs to a supporting manufacturer only where the supporting manufacturer is endorsed on the authorization or allowed under Central Excise rules; the authorization holder and co-holders are jointly and severally liable for completing the export obligation and must furnish Bond/LUT in joint names, and shipping documentation should name the supporting manufacturer as per the authorization. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Dec 27, 2019

Sir,

In my opinion the procedure followed by XYZ is correct.

DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Dec 27, 2019

In my view also it is correct.

MUKUND THAKKAR on Dec 30, 2019

First check the application done by XYZ and need to showing the supporting manufacturer PQR in application. if directly sending material to PQR. if basic condition is meet than XYZ can eligible for claim export obligation.

XYZ need to mention name of supporting manufacturer in shipping bill.as per application details with the DGFT.

YAGAY andSUN on Jun 2, 2020

4.35 Facility of Supporting Manufacturer/ Jobber/co- licensee

(a) Imported material may be used in any unit of holder of Advance Authorization subject to condition of paragraph 4.10 of this Handbook or jobber / supporting manufacturer provided same is endorsed on authorization by Regional Authority. If applicant desires to have name of any manufacturer or jobber added to authorization, he may apply. Such endorsement shall be mandatory where prior import before export is a condition for availing Advance Authorization scheme and authorization holder desires to have material processed through any other manufacturer or jobber.

(b) Upon such endorsement made by Regional Authority, authorization holder and co-authorization holder shall jointly and severally be liable for completion of EO. Any one of co-authorization holders may import goods in his name or in joint names. BG/LUT shall also be furnished in their joint names.

(c) If authorization holder is registered with Central Excise, he has an option of getting names of jobber endorsed by Central Excise as per Central Excise Rules in lieu of Regional Authority’s endorsement. In case manufacturer exporter holding authorization is not registered / not required to be registered with Central Excise authority, job work may be allowed as per Central Excise Rules and regulations without insisting for endorsement of supporting manufacturer’s name. However, authorization holder shall be solely responsible for imported items and fulfillment of EO.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues