Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

In put tax paid on construction of Convention Halls

Ravikumar Doddi

Dear sir,

Our applicant has constructed a convention Hall and paid a ₹ 1 Cr of Input tax on Construction of shed and other Material which is form part of Immovable property, will they eligible for ITC and can it be adjustable to out put tax. Earlier I read about ITC on construction of Hall which is let out for commercial purpose. Kindly guide us.

Input Tax Credit on Convention Hall Construction Denied Under GST Act, Section 17(5); Advance Ruling Recommended for Clarity. An applicant inquired about the eligibility for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the construction of a convention hall under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework. Three responses were provided. The first response stated that ITC is not available due to restrictions under Section 17(5) of the GST Act. The second response concurred, emphasizing adherence to the Act over case law. The third response suggested seeking an advance ruling for clarity, noting that if Section 17(5) restricts credit claims on construction materials and services, such claims will be disallowed by authorities. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues