Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Refund of accumulated ITC

Kaustubh Karandikar

XYZ importing goods against ‘Advance Authorization’. They had also fulfilled export obligation against the same by exporting the goods without payment of GST under LUT. They are now filing refund claim of accumulated ITC on account of continuous exports. Can they consider the value of exports made for fulfilment of export obligation against advance authorization, while claiming refund of accumulated ITC?

XYZ Seeks ITC Refund for Exports Under Advance Authorization; Debates on Relevance of Export Value and Applicable Rules XYZ is seeking to claim a refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to continuous exports under an Advance Authorization scheme. They have fulfilled their export obligations without paying GST under a Letter of Undertaking (LUT). One respondent suggests that the value of exported goods is not relevant for claiming accumulated credit, only proof of export and a bank realization certificate are needed. Another respondent states that the department disallows considering the value of exports for this purpose. A third respondent believes XYZ can claim a refund under Rule 89, but not under Rule 96 due to restrictions. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues