Sir
Section 6-A(3) of the CST Act,1956 provides for further reassessment of interstate stock transfers on the condition that, there shall be " discovery of new facts".
The legal position being so, what are the possible new facts that could be discovered by the assessing authority to re-open the concluded original reassessment three years back?
In the absence of any new facts discovered, whether assessing authority can invoke the jurisdiction under Section 6-A(3) of the CST Act?
pl enlighten with judicial rulings, if any.
TaxTMI