Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

DISCOVERY OF NEW FACTS.

Sadanand Bulbule

Sir

Section 6-A(3) of the CST Act,1956 provides for further reassessment of interstate stock transfers on the condition that, there shall be ' discovery of new facts'.

The legal position being so, what are the possible new facts that could be discovered by the assessing authority to re-open the concluded original reassessment three years back?

In the absence of any new facts discovered, whether assessing authority can invoke the jurisdiction under Section 6-A(3) of the CST Act?

pl enlighten with judicial rulings, if any.

Clarifying Section 6-A(3) of CST Act: What Justifies Reopening Interstate Stock Transfer Reassessments with New Facts? A discussion on the conditions under Section 6-A(3) of the CST Act, 1956, regarding the reassessment of interstate stock transfers if new facts are discovered. A participant queries what constitutes 'new facts' that would justify reopening a reassessment conducted three years prior. A respondent suggests that reassessment requires the discovery of new material facts impacting the assessment, such as potential tax evasion or non-deposition of collected tax. Without such discoveries, reassessment may not be warranted. Another participant expresses gratitude for the clarification. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues