Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

REVERSAL OF ITC UNDER SEC-16(2)-SECOND PROVISO VS. CIRCULAR-92/2019

Pramod Panda

The recipient based on the Discounts/Financial Credit Notes received as at 31.03.2018 in respect of supply received for the Financial years 2017-18 reversed the ITC and paid output tax accordingly in accordance with Second Proviso to Section-16(2). In respect of some invoices for 2017-18, though the 180 days period is not over, but based on self-repudiation of liability by the Supplier by issue of the Post-Supply Credit Notes, the recipient in accordance with Second Proviso to Sec-16(2) reversed the ITC while finalising accounts for 2017-18. The reversal of ITC is correct as per the law. This view of the recipient finds support in the case of 2019 (3) TMI 928 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU IN RE: M/S. MRF LIMITED Order No. 5/AAR/2019 Dated: - 22 January 2019.

Subsequently, CBIC issued a clarificatory circular bearing No-92/2019, Dt:07th. March,2019 clarifying that the Secondary Discounts/Post-Supply Discounts which are not in accordance with Sec-15(3)/Financial Credit Notes will not reduce the ITC availability with the recipient and Output Liability of the Supplier, since such discounts are not in compliance with Sec-34 read with Sec-15. The clarificatory Circulars are always issued by CBIC based on representations received from stakeholders. The CBIC while issuing the aforesaid Circular has not discussed or referred to the provision contained in the Second Proviso to Sec-16(2) which is binding on recipients. Can a Clarificatory Circular issued by CBIC will override the provision of law as contained in Sec-16(2) ?

In the instant case of the recipient, the reversal of ITC is in accordance with the provision of law.

Kindly provide your EXPERT views.

Can a CBIC Circular Override Legal Provisions on ITC Reversal Under Section 16(2) for Post-Supply Discounts? A discussion on the Goods and Services Tax (GST) addresses whether a clarificatory circular can override the legal provisions of Section 16(2) regarding Input Tax Credit (ITC) reversal. A recipient reversed ITC based on discounts and credit notes for the 2017-18 financial year, aligning with Section 16(2). However, a CBIC circular issued in March 2019 states that post-supply discounts not complying with Section 15(3) do not affect ITC availability. The forum queries if such circulars can override legal provisions. A response clarifies that commercial credit notes do not necessitate ITC reversal, whereas GST credit notes do, noting that ITC reversal is revenue neutral. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues