Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

transitional credit carried forward in gst

Richa Goyal

we had a balance of central excise credit which we carried forward in CGST in the TRANS -1 form. We did not utilize the CGST balance due to an ongoing litigation in the matter. Eventually , we reveresed the CGST credit in GSTR- 3B. Now the department states that we will have to pay the whole credit in cash as ongoing credit cannot be considered due change in regime from central excise to GST... Please guide.

Dispute Over Reversed Central Excise Credit in TRANS-1 Form: Is Additional Cash Payment Necessary? A user raised a query regarding the reversal of central excise credit carried forward to CGST via the TRANS-1 form, which remained unused due to ongoing litigation. The department demands cash payment for this credit, citing the transition from central excise to GST. Respondents disagree with the department, arguing that reversed credit equates to credit not taken, thus negating the need for cash payment. They reference court rulings and a circular (No. 42/2018) supporting their stance, emphasizing that the reversal is akin to payment and should not require additional cash settlement. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues