Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

whatsappJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

gst on services etc

Madhavan iyengar

A company X based in gujarat sold its product to a customer Y in Tamilnadu

The customer Y raised a complaint on X

X asked Y to contact its dealer Z in Tamilnadu

Z sent its technician and repaired the product

Z of Tamil nadu then raised its bill on X of Gujarat

In this case Z has to charge which tax on X

IGST applicability questioned for cross state repair services, contrasting IGST treatment with CGST and SGST invoicing consequences. A Gujarat seller's customer in Tamil Nadu obtained repair by a Tamil Nadu dealer who billed the seller. One view treats the repair as an intra state supply between dealer and customer, requiring CGST and SGST and limiting credit for the out of state seller. The alternate view treats the seller as de facto recipient with the dealer acting on its behalf, invoking IGST treatment. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Apr 29, 2019

Sir,

Since the service provider (Z) and service receiver (Y) are both located in the same state CGST and SGST is payable the service provider. However X cannot avail credit of input tax since he is located in gujarat since credit of CGST and SGST can be availed within thestate where such service has benn consumed. This is my opinion.

KASTURI SETHI on Apr 30, 2019

In my view, X is, de fecto, service receiver. Z is service provider. Z has acted for and on behalf of X. The situation is covered under Section 12 (2)(a) of IGST Act, 2017. Hence IGST is applicable.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues