Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

GST ITC in 3B as per bills but not reflecting in 2A

Balakrishnan Ramalingam

Dear sirs,

My client have received notice demanding ITC excess claim in 3B vis a vis 2A. Claim of ITC in 3B is genuine based on original invoices from vendors. Some other dealers in past receiving such notices just represented that they have valid bills and dept accepted. Now it seems dept. refusing to accept and demanding huge amounts of such differences between 3B and 2A.

What is the actual provisions as per GST Law to claim ITC. Please support your advises with circulars, notifications, press release etc., to represent before the Dept.

Thanks

R.Balakrishnan FCA

Client Challenges Excess ITC Claim in GST Due to Vendor Errors; Advocates Stress Vendor Compliance and Reconciliation A client received a notice for claiming excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) in GST Form 3B compared to Form 2A. The ITC claim is based on original invoices, but discrepancies arise when vendors fail to update their GSTR 1, affecting 2A. Contributors suggest ensuring vendors update their GSTR 1 and argue that ITC should not be denied due to vendor errors. They highlight the burden of proof lies with the claimant, and suggest resolving mismatches by reconciling figures and ensuring no revenue loss. Case laws and procedural lapses might offer some defense, but rectification is crucial. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues