Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Type of GST to be charged

Kaustubh Karandikar

XYZ (Mumbai) had paid rent towards their Delhi Office taken on rent and Delhi Office had taken input tax credit of the CGST + SGST charged in the Rent Invoice of the landlord. XYZ(Mumbai) had subsequently recovered the amount of rent paid of the Delhi office from their sister concern PQR, Pune by issuing a Service Invoice. XYZ need to charge CGST + SGST or IGST?

XYZ's Delhi Office Rent Subject to CGST and SGST; Mumbai Cannot Claim GST Credit, Consider IGST for Invoicing Options. A discussion on the appropriate type of GST to charge for a rent transaction involving XYZ's Mumbai and Delhi offices and their sister concern PQR in Pune. The consensus, led by Rajagopalan Ranganathan, is that since the immovable property is in Delhi, CGST and SGST should be charged, despite the rent being recovered from PQR. XYZ cannot claim GST credit as it is based in Mumbai. Other contributors suggest that Delhi should invoice PQR directly, or if Mumbai invoices, IGST should be charged due to the location of the supplier and place of supply. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Feb 4, 2019

Sir,

According to Section 12 (3) of IGST Act, 2017, "the place of supply of services, -

(a) directly in relation to an immovable property, including services provided by architects, interior decorators, surveyors, engineers and other related experts or estate agents, any service provided by way of grant of rights to use immovable property or for carrying out or co-ordination of construction work; or

(b) by way of lodging accommodation by a hotel, inn, guest house, home stay, club or campsite, by whatever name called, and including a house boat or any other vessel; or

(c) by way of accommodation in any immovable property for organising any marriage or reception or matters related thereto, official, social, cultural, religious or business function including services provided in relation to such function at such property; or

(d) any services ancillary to the services referred to in clauses (a), (b) and (c),

shall be the location at which the immovable property or boat or vessel, as the case may be, is located or intended to be located :

In your case the service is deemed to be provided at the place where the immovable property is located. Since it is located in Delhi, you have to pay CGST and SGST. Even if the rent is collected from another person the said fact will not affect place of supply of service and gst is to be paid accordingly. Only drawback is XYZ cannot avail the credit of gst paid since he is located at Mumbai.

KASTURI SETHI on Feb 4, 2019

I agree with Sh.Rajagopalan Ranganathan, Sir.

CASusheel Gupta on Feb 4, 2019

XYZ (Mumbai) Paid rent for Delhi Office

Delhi Office has taken ITC – it means Delhi Office is also registered in Delhi

XYZ (Mumbai) recovered rent from PQR (Pune)

In my view, since service has been availed by Delhi Office, it should raise invoice on PQR (Pune) instead of Mumbai Office.

Still if Mumbai wants to raise invoice, Delhi Office need to bill Mumbai Office and charge CGST + SGST and as pointed by Rajagopalan sir, Mumbai shall not be able to claim ITC and Mumbai office needs to charge IGST from Pune since location of supplier is Mumbai and POS is Delhi

Thanks and Regards

CA Susheel Gupta

Mahadev R on Feb 5, 2019

I have a different view. Ideally, Delhi should issue invoice on PQR, Mumbai charging local CGST + SGST. Transaction between Mumbai and Delhi can be only of fund transfer.

If Mumbai still wants to raise invoice on Pune treating itself as service provider, then IGST to be charged as location of supplier is Maharashtra and place of supply is Delhi (being location of property).

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues