Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Transfer of Manufacturing Unit and accumulated ITC from one state to another

Vinay Kunte

We have a GST registered Manufacturing Unit in Daman and want to transfer the unit to Maharashtra. We have huge amount of ITC Accumulated due to the high Imports under Excise and also under GST.

What is the way out / procedure to be followed to enable us to transfer the ITC to the new Unit after utilising the ITC for payment of GST Payable on raw materials, finished goods and capital goods are stock transferred to new unit?

Transferring GST-Registered Unit: Use Form GST ITC-02 for Input Tax Credit Transfer, Section 25(4) Clarifies Ownership Status A manufacturing unit registered under GST in Daman is being transferred to Maharashtra, and the owner seeks guidance on transferring accumulated Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to high imports. The initial advice suggests using Form GST ITC-02 under CGST Rules 41(1) to 41(4), which typically applies to business ownership changes. However, the owner clarifies that the transfer involves the same ownership but different state registration. The advisor confirms that under Section 25(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, this scenario is considered a transfer to a distinct person, thus the rules still apply. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues