Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Is RCM payable under GST on arbitrary fees paid

SAKTHIVEL K

Is GST applicable under RCM if fees is paid to a retired judge appeared arbitrary case

GST Reverse Charge Mechanism Applies to Arbitration Fees for Retired Judges, per Notification No.13/2017. A query was raised regarding the applicability of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) for fees paid to a retired judge involved in an arbitration case. One expert clarified that legal services provided by advocates or firms to business entities are liable under GST, referencing notification no.13/2017. Another expert corrected the term 'arbitrary case' to 'arbitration.' The final response concurred with the advice provided by the other experts, emphasizing the accuracy of their guidance. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Mahadev R on Jan 23, 2019

Services provided by an individual advocate including a senior advocate or firm of advocates by way of legal services to business entity would be liable. Please refer notification no.13/2017

DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Jan 23, 2019

Please correct 'arbitrary case' as 'arbitration'.

KASTURI SETHI on Jan 26, 2019

Rightly advised by both experts.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues