Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

SERVICES PROVIDED BY A DIRECTOR

raj babu

what will be the remedies available if the director has charged for his professional services in forward charge and company has not paid service tax on reverse charge mechanism. The director has paid all his laibility for service tax without claiming any cenvat credit.

Director Charges for Services; Company Liable for Reverse Charge Service Tax; Urged to Act Quickly to Avoid Penalties. A discussion on a forum addresses the issue of a director charging for professional services under the forward charge while the company failed to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. Experts advise that the service receiver (company) is liable to pay the service tax, and the director should seek a refund for the tax already paid. The consensus is that if the tax is paid to the exchequer, it cannot be demanded again, but the company should act swiftly to avoid penalties. If necessary, the company should justify and contest the situation with the authorities. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Dec 5, 2018

As per notification no.45/12-ST, 100 % ST is to be paid by Service Receiver under RCM. This liability cannot be discharged by Service Provider. If it is done so, it is legally totally wrong. Now SR has to pay its Service Tax and Service Provider is to claim refund. Otherwise Service Receiver is to face the consequences in the form of interest and penalty. If you want to save penalty, pay due Service Tax on your own. Take remedial action quickly before it is pointed out by the department.

DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Dec 6, 2018

Whether the Director paid the service tax payable by the company on reverse charge basis?

YAGAY andSUN on Dec 6, 2018

In our view, Director needs to seek refund and the company needs to pay the tax under reverse charge mechanism.

The alternate view is that since the tax is paid to exchequer hence on the same transaction the tax cannot be demanded. It is a settled legal position.

SHIVKUMAR SHARMA on Dec 6, 2018

I agree with the view of YAGAY ANDSUN

DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Dec 9, 2018

If the tax is inadvertently paid like the present case refund can be got.

Ganeshan Kalyani on Dec 14, 2018

It would be revenue neutral in case the tax is paid by the service receiver and the provider claims the refund of the tax paid. In my view, the case is justifiable to the department. However the lower authority may not accept the neutrality and he will insist to corrective action as suggested by the learned colleague expert. But it has to be justified and fought.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues