Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Amount paid on behalf of related party

Kaustubh Karandikar

XYZ is making payment to various parties on behalf of the persons / entities which are related to XYZ. The amount so paid is debited to the respective person / entities account. This being paid on behalf of related parties; will it amount to rendering service to related parties and XYZ will be liable to pay GST on it even if no consideration is received from related parties?

Debate Over XYZ's Role: Intermediary Liable for GST or Lender with GST-Exempt Interest? XYZ is paying on behalf of related parties, raising the question of whether this constitutes a service subject to GST, despite no consideration being received. One participant argues that this activity is part of business operations and classifies XYZ as an 'intermediary', liable for GST. Another suggests viewing the payments as loans, with interest as consideration, which is GST-exempt. The debate centers on whether XYZ's role fits the definition of an intermediary, as XYZ is not facilitating supply but making payments post-supply, thus acting more as a lender than an intermediary. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues