Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Late Delivery Charges

Kaustubh Karandikar

XYZ is receiving from PQR amount towards late delivery charges which will fall under the category of agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to tolerate an act or a situation, or to do an act and therefore XYZ will be liable to pay GST on the amount received. In this example, recipient of service is XYZ or PQR?

Debate on GST Applicability for Late Delivery Charges: Is PQR the Service Recipient under IGST Act Section 13(2)? A discussion on a forum addresses whether late delivery charges paid by PQR to XYZ are subject to Goods and Services Tax (GST). It is debated that XYZ, by imposing late delivery charges, is providing a service to PQR, making PQR the service recipient. If PQR is outside India, GST may not apply under Section 13(2) of the IGST Act. Participants also discuss whether these charges fall under Section 15(d) of the CGST Act, 2017, which includes penalties for delayed payment in the value of supply. The consensus leans towards PQR being the service recipient. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Nov 25, 2018

Tolerating, refraining from, agreeing to etc.is a service under GST. Who is tolerating ? Who is refraining from ? Who is agreeing to ? . XYZ is tolerating, refraining from, agreeing to by way of imposing late delivery charges upon PQR . So PQR is service receiver.

DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Nov 26, 2018

PQR is the service receiver.

Kaustubh Karandikar on Nov 26, 2018

If PQR is outside India, it will fall under Section 13(2) of IGST Act and since the recipient of service i.e. PQR is outside India, XYZ will not be liable to pay GST on it? Kindly confirm.

KASTURI SETHI on Nov 26, 2018

Very interesting issue. Worth to be examined in new situation. I agree with you , Sir.

Alkesh Jani on Nov 27, 2018

Dear Experts,

Can we apply Section 15 (d) of CGST Act,2017, in the Instant case?

Thanks,

With Regards,

Guest on Nov 27, 2018

I think PQR is the service receiver

CASusheel Gupta on Dec 2, 2018

In my view, the person booking the expenses shall always be recipient (PQR) and one booking income (XYZ) shall always be supplier.

As per section 15(2)(d) value of supply include interest or late fee or penalty for delayed payment of any consideration for any supply.

Therefore the POS for late payment charges shall be equivalent to original supply.

Alkesh Jani on Dec 3, 2018

Dear Kaustubh Karandikar,

In this regards, first of all it is to be decided that, late delivery charges received by the XYZ, is in relation to any Supply i.e. Goods or Services?. If this is the case, than PQR has already raised an Invoice and XYZ will deduct the amount of late delivery charges, this amount is to be included for valuation purpose, as per above mentioned section. but as Invoice of the same amount is raised PQR has nothing to do, but XYZ will book it as late delivery charges.

Now with regards to services mentioned above, the late delivery charges are not independent services rendered, the services mentioned is sort of independent in nature for example, Film artist under contract is restricted to undertake any Advt. during a period and some artist has to undergo some act (some reality shows) which they are to be tolerated example, playing with snake or something like that...

Based on above, I am of the view that late delivery charges cannot be classified as the services mentioned. Any different views, or any correct by our Hon'ble Experts is highly solicited.

With Regards,

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues