Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Input Reversal

Ethirajan Parthasarathy
  1. A developer engages various contractors for putting up the Building.

A percentage of contractor’s Bill is kept as “retention money” which will be paid after long duration. Similarly some portion of Bill is not paid and kept as “hold” money for defective work which will be paid after defect is set right

Both the above could be outstanding for more than 180 days.

Does it mean the developer has to reverse the Input Credit already availed on above two components.

Developer Queries GST Input Credit Reversal for Retention Money; Suggests Paying GST to Contractors, Seeks Advance Ruling for Clarity A developer inquires about reversing Input Credit under GST for retention and hold money kept from contractors' bills, which can be outstanding for over 180 days. The response suggests paying the GST portion of the retention to the contractor and obtaining an acknowledgment receipt. This aligns with the GST Act's aim for seamless credit movement and avoids arbitrage. It advises defining consideration terms in the work order, stating that GST on retention money discharges the bill's consideration. It also recommends seeking an advance ruling from GST authorities to avoid litigation, costing 10,000. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues