Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

AMORTISATION REQUIREMENT UNDER GST

CABIJENDERKUMAR BANSAL

X(USA) has signed contract with Y(India) for production of goods & export to X.Mould was to be provided by X as per contract. X has given advance of ₹ 50 L to Y for purchase of mould in India & to be retained by Y for production. Y purchased mould from Z(India) & availed GST input on this. Should Y raise export invoice of mould to X(though physically to be retained by Y)? or Y shall add amortised cost of mould in export invoices of goods to X? is input eligible on purchase of mould by Y from z.

GST Query: Should Y Invoice Mould to X or Amortize Cost in Exports? Circular Guidance Debated. A discussion on the Goods and Services Tax (GST) addressed a query about the treatment of a mould purchased by Y (India) from Z (India) for production under a contract with X (USA). X provided an advance for the mould, which Y retained for production. The question was whether Y should invoice the mould to X or include its amortised cost in the goods exported to X. Responses highlighted the importance of the invoice's name and referenced a circular for guidance. The circular's clarity was debated, with specific points on tool movement and credit reversal discussed. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Jun 18, 2018

Sir ,

It depends on the invoice raised by Z whether the invoice is raise in the name of Y or in the name of X but to be delivered to Y. If supply of mould by Z is to Y then Y can avail the credit and on exporting the mould to X on completion of production and supply programme he can claim the refund of ITC of gst paid on the mould. Under GST law amortization of mould cost is not comtyemplated.

YAGAY andSUN on Jun 18, 2018

Pl. check point no. 1 of th Circular No. 47/21/2018-GST dtd. 08th June in matter.

SANTHANA KRISHNAN on Jul 27, 2018

Sir,

in the said notification, i could not make any difference between 1.2 & 1.3.

can anyone explain to me with nice examples? thanks & regards

J Ramamurthy

Nash Industries I Pvt Ltd on Nov 17, 2018

The most confusing circular is the circular dated 8th June 2018 regarding moulds and dies. It has raised more doubts rather than clarity.

Nash Industries I Pvt Ltd on Nov 17, 2018

1.1 - situation where the tools are moved from the OEM to the component manufacturer. Not a supply. No tax payable. No reversal of credit.

1.2 Further clarifies point 1.1 that in such case no need to add the amortised value to the component.

1.3 situation (bill to ship to) - retained by the component manufacturer - no movement of tool from OEM to component manufacturer - Credit to be reversed. Amortised cost to be included in the value.

Had the clarification at point 1.2 be after 1.3, then the issue would have been clear. But that was not the intention.

Regards

S.Ramaswamy

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues