Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 113733
Like 0Bookmark

Section 50C

Date 12 May 2018
Replies1 Reply
Views 914 Views
Valuation under section 50C: stamp duty value may trigger reassessment and penalty where declared consideration is lower.
Dispute over valuation under section 50C where AO enhanced long term capital gains by adopting stamp duty value exceeding sale consideration; facts include differing dates for sale agreement and deed with a valuation change in between, contested inclusion of building/extension values, an authorised representative's failure to supply correct details, an AO remand report issued without notice, and subsequent penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) read with section 274 for alleged concealment under section 50C. (AI Summary)

During scrutiny AO rejected revised computations not supported by revised returns reg Long term capital gains invested under section 54 and in the Appeal before CIT(A) enhanced assessment by accusing concealment of income arrived on the basis of section 50C.Difference between stamp duty value and sale consideration.Asseessee with husband abroad during material period.Authorised rep (AR) not furnished correct details even though entire information available with him.AY2011-12 Asseessee sold two properties and purchased one property one property inherited one during 1939 and other was purchased in 2006-07 Ay.AR submitted LTCG only for Land per sq yard not considered building and extension during 97-98 AY. for 2nd property sale agreement was on 31st July and sale deed was made on 16th august.state Govt increased market value from 1st august and Fair market value is less than stamp duty value.CIT(A) says we did enhancement on the basis of AR information.he said remand report received from AO.Ao not issued any notice for Remand report.CIT(A) issued penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) read with U/s 274 for concealment of income under section 50C. Kindly reply

1 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on May 12, 2018
1.

Your case requires detailed analysis. Better to approach the professionals.

Recent Issues