Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Tax liability in case of change in constitution

Guest

Hello

We have a partnership firm and registered as composition dealer under GST regime. now i want to convert the same to proprietorship by retiring one partner and other one continue in same business under same banner. is there any tax liability arise on closing stock? in proprietorship also i want to continue under composition dealer.

Transition from Partnership to Proprietorship: GST Impact on Closing Stock and Composition Dealer Status Explained. A partnership firm registered as a composition dealer under GST is transitioning to a proprietorship by retiring one partner. The key concern is whether tax liability arises on the closing stock during this transition. One response indicates that taking over a business as a whole is exempt under GST. Another suggests that a new registration is required, and the composition dealer status cannot continue without reapplication. The issue of paying GST twice on the transfer of stock is raised, highlighting the challenge of no input tax credit (ITC) for composition dealers. Overall, fresh registration and consideration of GST implications are necessary. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Padmanathan KV on May 8, 2018

WHEN THE BUSINESS OF THE PARTNERSHIP IS TAKEN OVER BY ONE PATNER AS A PROPRIETORSHIP, IT WILL BE EXEMPT "TAKING OVER A BUSINESS AS A WHOLE" IS EXEMPTED UNDER GST

DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on May 8, 2018

In my view you cannot continue under erstwhile composite dealer system. You have to obtain a fresh. You have to surrender the certificate of registration and pay the dues payable.

YAGAY andSUN on May 8, 2018

Generally, in case of change of constitution of a registered person on account of sale, merger, demerger etc,
the unutilised ITC shall be allowed to be transferred to the transferee. In our view you should remain as compositions dealer.

Guest on May 8, 2018

we have to surrender firm's GST No. And will obtained new GST no. Under proprietorship. If both are regular dealer then there is no problem arise as we can issue tax invoice of whole stock from partnership firm to proprietorship. So tax liabilty of firm can be paid and ITC in proprietorship can be availed. But we are composition dealer. If we pay GST on closing stock in partnership firm for transfer of stock to proprietorship then we are going to pay two time GST. One at the time of transfer to proprietorship and again we have to pay gst in proprietorship on final sale.

KASTURI SETHI on May 9, 2018

Dear Querist,

There is no doubt that afresh registration is required as rightly advised by Dr.Govindarajan, Sir.. When you apply for a new registration, you are to decide whether to opt for composition dealer or not. New registration, afresh option is required. It is natural that a composition dealer cannot avail ITC

Actually, no-provision of ITC as composition dealer is a hurdle for you. Otherwise there would have been no problem as rightly advised by M/s.YAGAY and SUN in first paragraph.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues