Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

adjustment of demand with other unit

Arun Aggarwal

Sir

we have two units registered with central excise in which one of the partner is common and are in the same range of excise.

Excise officials wants to adjust/ hold the refund of one unit because of the demand in the other unit being having a common partner.

Both the units are manufacturing different products.

Pls advice the legal course of this situation.

Arun

Excise officials wrongly attempt to adjust refunds between two business units with common partners; appeal advised. Two business units, sharing a common partner and registered under central excise, face an issue where excise officials intend to adjust the refund of one unit due to a demand on the other. Despite manufacturing different products, the officials treat them as a single entity. Legal advice suggests this action is unsustainable, as precedent and a 1992 circular indicate that mere commonality of partners does not justify treating them as a single unit for excise purposes. The recommended legal course is to file an appeal if the refund is denied. Another contributor agrees, emphasizing the need for quasi-judicial proceedings to declare both units as the same before adjusting refunds. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues