After reading the provisions and anlysing the nature of transaction i feel it can be interpretated in two ways:
1) Company is paying rent for residential use of Staff/Employee of its company, which (Rent) is part of its employment policy or is part of employment benefits or part of employee's Salary.
Then the said rent paid by the company is not liable to levy of GST .{As rent paid by company are indirectly recovered from employee}
2) Company is paying rent for residential use of Staff/Employee of its company, which (Rent) is not part of its employment policy or is part of employment benefits or part of employee's Salary.and the company is claiming as expenditure in its profit and Loss A/c. which means the expenditure is done for Business (may be to retain the employee for long term or any other reason).
Then the said rent should be liable to levy GST .
Although it has not been specifically mentioned in Act but a logical interpretation can be made from the above case.
Please give your views if your opinion is in favor/against to me.
Regards:
Harshit Jain
FCA