Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Applicability of cenvat credit reversal on processed input goods exported

Bhausaheb Gole

Dear Experts,

We are manufacturing temprature measuring instruments & our unit is registered with Central Excise. our products are covered under First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff, Act in chapter 90, we procured the excisable raw materials from our local suppliers as well as overses suppliers on fully paid excise duty, & We avail the Cenvat credit on all inputs procured in the factory, further we are doing various manufacturing process like Cutting, Super Polishing, Kordt Meter testing, Assembly, Calibration, Coating, Checking, thread measurements, job work and which will have involvement of high value machineries then goods are being Exported under BOND / REBATE with specified packing requirement & very rare & few parts which we procured from local market & doing testig,calbration, cutting, coating, measurement checking activity on that and EXPORT's these goods as a SFG.

Now, my issue is:

Excise department has raised the question on SFG, which includes only testing, caliration,cutting,coating checking activity & it does not amount to manufacture as per Section 2(f) in The Central Excises, & they called as it's a nothing but Trading Activity hence department demand us to reverse the cenvat credit on SFG & they applied Rule 6 also.

My View is:

If Goods are exported or cleared as such for exports under bond or under rebate (If our processes doen't cover under Section 2(f) in The Central Excises)

  • it is relevant to examine the provisions under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 will be treated as deemed manufacturing. Reference to Circular No.283/117-CX.8 dated 31-12-1996.
  • In the supplementary instructions of the cbec manual it is clearly written in para 3.4 of chapter 5 that inputs and capital goods can be removed for export under bond ie without payment of duty 'there is no bar a manufacturer to remove the inputs or capital goods as such for export under bond'.
  • Provison of Rule (6) of Cenvat Credit Rule 2004.on reversal of cenvat credit @6/7% on value of goods (Difference between the value of Sales & cost of goods. 'It is not applicable if goods are exported please read provision Rule 6 sub rule 6 & clause V'.
  • It's revenue neutral case, there is no loss of GOVT.

Please ADVICE :

On aforesaid all scenario i wanted to know relevant CASE LAWS, further Notifications & Circulars to prove that there is no need to reverse the CENVAT Credit or applicability of Rule 6, if goods are exported.

Manufacturing Unit Challenges Cenvat Credit Reversal for Exported Semi-Finished Goods; Debates Rule 6 Interpretation and Section 2(f). A manufacturing unit dealing in temperature measuring instruments, registered under Central Excise, sought advice on the reversal of Cenvat credit for semi-finished goods (SFG) exported. The excise department questioned the classification of certain processes, such as testing and coating, as manufacturing, labeling them as trading activities, thus requiring Cenvat credit reversal under Rule 6. Various experts provided opinions, citing legal precedents and arguing that the processes, though not manufacturing per Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, should not necessitate credit reversal if goods are exported. The discussion highlighted differing interpretations of the rules and the need for relevant case laws to support the manufacturer's stance. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues