Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Eligibility of documents issued by importers during 2012-13 for credit purpose

Himansu Sekhar

Sir,

My query is

The importers were added in rule 9 of CE rules for taking regn wef Dec,13

Before that they were passing credit as the dealers after taking regn

Dept. Many times objects this as ineligible since the invoice issued by importers is not a valid document before 2013.

Is there any circular/instructions

Kindly clarify

Regards

Eligibility of Importers' 2012-13 Invoices for Credit under Central Excise Rules Analyzed; Rule 9 Implications Discussed An inquiry was raised regarding the eligibility of documents issued by importers during 2012-13 for credit purposes under Central Excise rules. The issue concerns whether invoices issued by importers before December 2013, when they were added to Rule 9 for registration, are valid for credit. Responses discussed the refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) and the absence of relevant circulars or notifications before 2013. It was noted that prior notifications allowed credit based on importer invoices, and importers were treated like dealers for registration. A draft circular was proposed to address these issues, but it was not finalized. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues