Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Cenvat Credit on Outward Transportation of Goods

abhishek ghai

Dear Experts,

Pls. Resolve the Issue that whether cenvat credit of Service tax paid under RCM on GTA Services availed by a manufacturer on Outward transportation of finished goods from the factory to buyers premises during the F.Y. 2014-15 shall be admissible.

Even though the Place of Removal has been clearly defined vide notification No.21/2014, but whether the CBEC Circular no. 988/12/2014-CX hold relevance as it states that- 'the Place where sale has taken place or when the property in goods passes from the seller to the Buyer is the relevant consideration to determine the Place of Removal ', further it lays stress on the Sales of Goods Act, 1930 wherein the factors specified in the given circulars are satisfied.

Kindly let me know the relevance of circular for the F.Y. 2014-15 and onwards and other judicial pronouncements.

Regards,

CA Abhishek Ghai

Rajiv Mehrotra & Associates

Kanpur

Debate on Cenvat Credit for Service Tax on Outward Transport: Impact of CBEC Circulars and Supreme Court Rulings A discussion on whether Cenvat credit for service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism on Goods Transport Agency services for outward transportation of goods is admissible for the fiscal year 2014-15. The query references a CBEC circular and the Sales of Goods Act, 1930, questioning their relevance. A response highlights a shift in the Board's stance on determining the 'place of removal,' emphasizing that recent circulars and Supreme Court judgments support this change, suggesting the Board's clarification is retrospective. The response concludes that input service credit should be admissible based on specific case facts. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues