Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Removal of goods i.e. Input, Capital Goods as such -

vinay wakde

We are manufacturer as well as service provider. We are taking credit on Input, Capital Goods & Input services. We have cleared Input and Capital Goods as such and reversed proportionate credit taken on input /Capital goods as per Rule 3(5) of CCR,2004. However, we have not reversed proportionate credit taken on Input services.

We have now asked by the Department to submit details for last three years i.e. for as such removal of Input & Capital goods from the factory. As per the Department such kind of routing of input/Capital Goods to second manufacturer, getting extra credit of input services to the first manufacturer.

Kindly let us know (1) whether proportionate credit taken on input services required to be reversed (2) How to calculate Input service credit involved on removal of input & capital goods as such (3) whether the Department raised demand for recovery of duty (4) Is there any case law in our support to reply the letter.

Regards,

VINAY

Manufacturer Questions Input Service Credit Reversal for Past Clearances under Cenvat Credit Rule 3(5); Weighs Litigation Costs A manufacturer and service provider sought advice on whether they need to reverse the proportionate credit taken on input services when clearing input and capital goods as per Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Department requested details for the past three years, alleging extra credit of input services. Respondents clarified that reversal of input service credit is not mandated by the rule, citing case law supporting this interpretation. They advised against contesting if the disputed amount is minimal due to high litigation costs. The consensus was to reverse the credit only if financially prudent. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues