Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 109851
Like 0 Bookmark

Service under Reverse charge mechanism

Date 09 Feb 2016
Replies 12 Replies
Views 4007 Views
Reverse charge liability: ultimate recipient bears tax when intermediary acts as a pure agent without markup.
When an intermediary invoices an ultimate recipient at the exact amount charged by the service provider with no markup and as a reimbursement, the intermediary is a pure agent and the reverse charge mechanism makes the ultimate recipient liable for service tax. If the intermediary adds any additional consideration, the intermediary's supply becomes taxable and the intermediary must account for service tax. Classification as intermediary services or works-contract-related supply, contractual terms, invoice particulars, and valuation (pure labour vs abatement) determine the correct tax incidence and potential penalty exposure. (AI Summary)

Dear Experts,

I would like to discuss on Service Tax applicability under below given scenario:

Suppose, a service provider (say ‘A’) who as ‘pure agent’ has arranged ‘legal consultancy service‘ from Advocate (say ‘B’) for actual receiver of service (say ‘C’). Here, ‘B’ has raised invoice on ‘A’ who in turn has raised an invoice on ‘C’ with actual cost basis and no profit element. The description on invoice appears as ‘reimbursement of legal consultancy service’. Now, the question is who will have to pay service tax.

Here no doubt ‘legal consultancy service’ is covered under reverse charge mechanism. Primarily 'A' has availed or arranged service from 'B' for 'C'. Hence 'A' is just acting as 'Pure Agent' and ultimate receiver of service is 'C'. Hence in my view 'C' is suppose to pay service tax.

Request you all to share your views in this regard.

Thanks.

12 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues