Yes Sir, it is a fact that the definition of Consideration has been amended as correctly explained above.
At present, any activity undertaken if it is not there in the negative list would become taxable. The next question arises that whether the activity of incurring such expenditure on behalf of the service receiver itself is considered as service?
This question would give rise to two results:
1. “Where in the Reimbursements have not been shown as a separate amount in Invoice “or “if the separate amount shown in the reimbursement is not the actual amount incurred” then it would tantamount to service as it gains the nature of “ service charge”,
2. “Wherein the reimbursements amount (actual incurred) have been separately shown in the Invoice, and the service provider has proper documentary evidence to support the fact that the amounts incurred are reimbursement of expenses” then it would not be treated as a service charge but mere obligation of other met by service provider.
Conclusion:
If Proper documentary evidence and records (all invoices) are maintained for expenses incurred in behalf of Service recipient, then the service Tax may not be charged.
Also refer to the following coloured lines cited in the definition of Consideration under section 67 :-
(ii) any reimbursable expenditure or cost incurred by the service provider and charged, in the course of providing or agreeing to provide a taxable service, except in such circumstances, and subject to such conditions, as may be prescribed;
In view of above, in the present case, since only occasional expenses not relating to the services provided were made and separate invoices were raised for actual reimbursement, therefore it appears service tax is not chargeable.