Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?
Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Sir,
For answer to all your queries, please refer Notification No. 21/2004 CE (N.T.) dated 06.09.2004 and Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules 2002.
Dear Raja Krishnan Ji,
In the situation explained by you, I am of the view that your rebate claim under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 or refund claim for credit of duty paid on the inputs under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules,2004 would be hit by Notification Nos.8/15-CE(NT) dated 1.3.15 and 6/15-CE(NT) dated 1.3.15 respectively due to change in in definition of the term, "Export Goods" w.e.f. 1.3.2015. Kindly read between the lines and ask further, if required.
Dear K Raja,
We endorse the view of 'Kasturi Sir' in this matter.
Regards,
YAGAY and SUN
(Management, Business and Indirect Tax Consultants)
By Quoting rule 18 above in my earlier reply dated 24.11.2015, the aspect of notification no 08/2015 CE NT has already been incorporated/covered therein, as rule 18 is itself based on the said notification.
Other replies on the said query were provided thereafter and that too after studying rule 18 quoted in my earlier reply (under which reference to notification no. 08/2015 CE NT has already been discussed in the said rule) 18) , which therefore means that the impact of the said notification was already covered in my earlier dated 24.11.2015 reply quoted above.
Therefore, same things were being repeated in a different way.
M/s.YAGAY and SUN,
Dear Sirs,
Yours observations dated 28.11.2015 are really a source of inspiration for me. Thanks a tonne.
KASTURI LAL SETHI
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.