Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

REBATE CLAIM

pradip patwardhan

Dear Experts

We are as an Exporter regularly file service tax rebate claim under notification 41/2012-ST in resect of service tax paid on input service of Business support service and clearing and forwarding service. We have been regularly receiving the rebate claim since last 3 years but now the department new officer is of the view that the amount of service tax paid to our service provider has been recovered by us from importer (our buyer) as it is subsequently included in the invoice value and hence Show cause notice issued by the dept.and asked to why the claim amount should not be rejected.

Kindly post your valuable reply on above matter urgently....

Thanks & regards,

Pradip Patwardhan

Maharashtra

Exporter Disputes Service Tax Rebate Claim Under Notification 41/2012-ST; Experts Argue Transaction Value Exclusion. An exporter is facing a challenge with a service tax rebate claim under notification 41/2012-ST. Despite regularly receiving rebates for three years, a new tax officer suggests that the service tax paid is being recovered from the importer, as it is included in the invoice value. Consequently, a show cause notice was issued. One expert argues that service tax on input services should not be part of the transaction value for exported services, making the notice unjustifiable. Another expert discusses the conditions under which rebates are allowed, emphasizing the distinction between services used beyond and up to the place of removal. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Oct 7, 2015

Sir,

It is the policy of Government of India only services are to be exported and not service tax paid on input service. Since you are availing credit of service tax paid on input services as credit, according to principles of costing, such service tax paid on input service cannot form part of transaction value of service exported. Therefore the contention of the officer that you have collected the service tax paid on input service from the importer of service is not tenable. Therefore if any show cause notice on the above ground is not maintainable in the eye of law.

ashish chaudhary on Oct 9, 2015

The intention of Notification No. 41/2012-ST is to allow refund/rebate of those services which have been used beyond the place of removal as Cenvat Credit cannot be allowed for the services used beyond place of removal. If services which have been claimed as rebate have been utilised beyond place of removal, there can not be denial of rebate/refund. On the other hand, if services have been used upto place of removal, credit can be claimed as input service and refund may be claimed under Rule 5 of CCR. Rebate may not be granted on such service.

This issue has mainly arisen recently after clarification issued by Board regarding meaning of "Place of Removal" in case of export.

If you are manufacturer, suggested to take input credit of services upto place of removal (which is considered port in case of export) and file rebate claim for services beyond place of removal (practically very few services left). You could also consider going for fixed percentage of rebate under 41/2012-ST and claiming credit of services upto place of removal.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues