Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Revised return validity & Mat related issue.

G. Tipra

Fact of Case:
Assessment year 2012-2013
Corporate Assessee
Original Return filed in time. 139(1)


Problem:
During scrutiny-
AO observe MAT payable against deduction u/s 80-IC and issue notice u/s 142(1).

80-IC income become liable to Mat as the per the amendment.

Against such notice
- Revised return is filed on 15/09/2014 accepting MAT payable
- Tax has been deposited with interest
- And Copy of 29B dated 25/08/2012 to AO

Query: Whether Revised return can be Accepted or rejected?
Is penalty on the ground of intentional omission can be imposed?

Corporate Assessee Revises Tax Return Post-Scrutiny, Accepts MAT Under Section 80-IC; Penalty Questioned for Omission A corporate assessee filed an original tax return on time for the assessment year 2012-2013. During scrutiny, the Assessing Officer (AO) noted that Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) was payable against a deduction under section 80-IC due to an amendment. A notice under section 142(1) was issued, prompting the assessee to file a revised return on 15/09/2014, accepting the MAT payable and depositing the tax with interest. The query raised was whether the revised return could be accepted or rejected and if a penalty for intentional omission could be imposed. The response sought clarification on whether the issue was resolved. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues