Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Sec 43CA of income tax applicablity

Guest

Dear Sir

I had applied for a site in Bangalore in the year 2006 and paid 60% amount to the builder by way of Demand Draft.

There was an agreement between our Bank Employees Union who is a felicitator between the Builder and me. The builder issued me an allotment/ offer letter in tis effect

The agreed rate was ₹ 560/- per sft. The builder got final permission from BMRDA on Oct 2014 and send me a letter stating that the plot is ready for registration and asked me to pay the balance amount of 40%.

Further the builder is demanding an extra amount of ₹ 190/- per sft stating that the Govt of Karnataka has raised the guidance value as ₹ 750/-.

The builder is stating that since new provisions of Sec 43CA is applicable to him and the IT dept will calculate his income at the guidance value [ i.e stamp value for registration].

Is it correct in his demand.

Whether the sec 43CA [Sub section 1,2,3,4] can give any relief for me since there was an agreement before the increase of guidance value and I paid some amount by way of Demand draft.

Please guide me

Regards

V madhusudhan.

Section 43CA: Real Estate Deals Must Match Guidance Value at Registration, Despite Earlier Agreements A user inquired about the applicability of Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act regarding a real estate transaction in Bangalore. They had agreed to a price of 560 per square foot with a builder in 2006, paying 60% upfront. In 2014, the builder requested the remaining balance and an additional 190 per square foot due to an increased government guidance value. The user questioned the legality of this demand under Section 43CA, given the prior agreement. A respondent clarified that the property value must align with the guidance value at the time of registration, regardless of earlier agreements. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues