Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Foreign Inward Remittance

Gopalarathnam Muralidharan

Dear Sir

I would like to have your valuable opinion on this.

1) My client is an Indian Co., Its shares are held by Kuwaiti Citizen 95% and the balance 5% is held by 4 individuals (all are Indian citizens). All of them are directors in Indian Company.

2) Kuwaithi national also runs similar type of company and he holds almost 95% shares in Dubai

2) The company deals in wholesale trading of Plastic granules

3) The Kuwaithi national in order to sustain Indian operations kept sending amount to Indian Company.

4) These remittances were made by the Dubai based company on account of the Kuwaithi national.

5) In India Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate issued by the Bank was in the name of company rather than the foreign national.

6) The company applied to RBI Mumbai and FC-GPR filed in the name of Foreign national and shares allotted.

7) Subsequently also the foreign national kept sending the money for sustaining Indian operations. Though the individual sent all the remittances in his name through his office at Dubai but FIRC obtained in India was in the name of Dubai company only.

8) Since FIRC issued by Banks were in the name of Dubai based company, credit was given in the name of Dubai company in our books and it is exhibited in Long term borrowings.

9) Though all the remittances were from the Foreign National but erroneously FIRCs were given in the name of Dubai company, can we incorporate in the notes on accounts saying that Long term borrowings are from the Foreign national.

10) These remittances were from 2003 to 2012.

11) No inward remittances during 2012-13 and 2013-14.

12) Kindly let me know how to go about. Whether rectification possible at RBI Level else how it can be brought in the Notes on Accounts

13) Looking forward to your reply

Company seeks RBI guidance on correcting fund source mislabeling from Dubai entity to Kuwaiti owner in financial records. An Indian company, primarily owned by a Kuwaiti national, received funds from a Dubai-based company to sustain its operations. The Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates (FIRCs) were issued in the name of the Dubai company, despite the funds being from the Kuwaiti individual. The company recorded these as long-term borrowings from the Dubai entity. The query seeks advice on whether rectification is possible with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) or if the notes on accounts can reflect the borrowings as from the foreign national. The response inquires if the issue has been clarified. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues