Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query βœ•
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

IS CAS 4 CERTIFICATE REQUIRED ( RULE 8 OF VALUATION)

Guest

Dear Sir,

We had sent a intermediate product to one of our processor(Job worker) under rule 8 Valuation on duty payment alongwith with CAS4 certificate and he had availed credit on that , but the product has remained unused, So if the job worker has to sell such product without processing, So whether he has to do valuation under rule 3(5) of Cenvat credit rules 2004, by reversing full credit availed on that product, IF yes then whether for such clearance is it required to issue CAS 4 certificate again by the processor at the time of sale of such products.

Clarification: CAS-4 Certificate Not Needed Under Rule 8 for Unused Intermediate Products Sent to Job Worker A discussion on whether a CAS-4 certificate is required under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules when an intermediate product is sent to a job worker and remains unused. It was clarified that sending an intermediate product to a processor does not qualify as captive consumption, thus Rule 8 is not applicable. The product should be valued at normal transaction value, and a CAS-4 certificate is unnecessary. The processor can avail credit on the duty paid. It is suggested to pay duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, not Rule 10A, as no job work was performed. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Aug 26, 2014

Sir,

Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable goods) Rules, 2000 states that-

8. Where whole or part of the excisable goods are not sold by the assessee but are used for consumption by him or on his behalf in the production or manufacture of other articles, the value of such goods that are consumed shall be one hundred and ten per cent of the cost of production or manufacture of such goods.

My basic doubt is whether sending the intermediate product to a processor under job work notification can be treated as captive consumption. Captive consumption means goods are not sold but consumed within the same factory or another factory of the same manufacturer, that is, inter unit transfer. In your case clearance of intermediate product to one of your processor cannot be treated as captive consumption. Therefore you need not follow rule 8 for valuation of such intermediate product. It can be sent to the processor by quoting normal transaction value as if you have sold to independent, non-related buyer and of course on payment of duty. The processor can avail the credit of duty paid by you and adopt transaction value as per his invoice for payment of duty when sells the intermediate product as such and utilize the credit taken.

Rajagopalan Ranganathan on Aug 26, 2014

Sir,

Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable goods) Rules, 2000 states that-

8. Where whole or part of the excisable goods are not sold by the assessee but are used for consumption by him or on his behalf in the production or manufacture of other articles, the value of such goods that are consumed shall be one hundred and ten per cent of the cost of production or manufacture of such goods.

My basic doubt is whether sending the intermediate product to a processor under job work notification can be treated as captive consumption. Captive consumption means goods are not sold but consumed within the same factory or another factory of the same manufacturer, that is, inter unit transfer. In your case clearance of intermediate product to one of your processor cannot be treated as captive consumption. Therefore you need not follow rule 8 for valuation of such intermediate product and you do not require to obtain CAS-4 Certificate. It can be sent to the processor by quoting normal transaction value as if you have sold to independent, non-related buyer and of course on payment of duty. The processor can avail the credit of duty paid by you and adopt transaction value as per his invoice for payment of duty when sells the intermediate product as such and utilize the credit taken.

YAGAY andSUN on Aug 27, 2014

Dear Sandesh,

Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, is not applicable in your matter. Please pay duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 3 of the Valuation Rules. Further, in our opinion, even Rule 10A of the Valuation Rules would not be applicable, since, Job-work is not done.

Regards

YAGAY and SUN

(Management and Indirect Tax Consultants)

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues