Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Empty Barrels Purchase

Deepak Sarathy

We are purchasing Empty barrels from a Company It has been clarified from Central Excise notification no 721/37/2003-CX dated 06/06/2003 that 'Selling of Empty Packing materials are Non-Excisable' Mean while in 2008 a new Explanation has been Inserted under sec2(D) Which states 'Products that are deemed Markatable' that arise in due coarse of Manufacturing Which is argued by the Company that Empty barrels are Exciseable and the referred notification is Silent Kindly provide us a case law after 2008 regarding the empty barrel issue (We have referred the Gulf oil case that the Judgement is Only provided on 2008 not the case) Please anyone clarify us with a proof or case law Kindly help

Confusion over excisability of empty barrels persists post-2008 amendment; RTI confirms 2003 circular's validity. A discussion on the excisability of empty barrels purchased from a company, referencing a Central Excise notification from 2003 that deemed selling empty packing materials as non-excisable. A 2008 amendment introduced the concept of 'marketable' goods, causing confusion. A consultant cited a Supreme Court decision supporting non-excisability, but the company remains unconvinced, seeking post-2008 case law. Despite no new judgments found, the consultant suggested consulting the Central Excise Department. An RTI order confirmed the 2003 circular's validity, and parties exchanged emails for further information sharing. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues