Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

clearance of coal fines - procedure

phaniraju konidena

Dear Professionals,

We are manufacturers of iron and steel and using coal to substitute the furnace oil due to heavy cost. After processing of the said coal by sizing and screening as required to our needs, some 'COAL FINES' are generated, which are waste for us and hence, cleared the same on payment of excise duty on the basis of 'transaction value'. But the department directing to clear the same on 'as such' category. Kindly clarify.

Debate Over Excise Duty on Coal Fines: Are They Distinct from Coal or Not? Legal Interpretations Vary. A manufacturer of iron and steel sought advice on the excise duty treatment for coal fines generated during coal processing. The manufacturer paid excise duty based on transaction value, but the department insisted on clearing them as 'as such' goods. Respondents debated whether coal fines are distinct from coal, affecting their tax classification. One consultant suggested reversing the duty to avoid litigation if the duty difference is minimal. Another argued that coal fines are not manufactured goods, supporting the department's stance. The discussion referenced legal precedents, highlighting differing interpretations of waste and scrap in excise duty contexts. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues