Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Central Excise on manufacture of PET Bottle by a Liquor Company for captive use for filling liquor

Ramachandran and Ramachandran Associates Subramanian

A distillery  is also manufacturing PET BOTTLES for captive use of filling liquor. The entire production is utilised captively.  Whether there is any incidence of Central Excise on manufacture of PET BOTTLES ?

Distillery Challenges Central Excise Duty on PET Bottles for Captive Use; Debates on Registration Under Excise Act, 1944. A distillery manufacturing PET bottles for captive use in filling liquor is questioning the applicability of Central Excise Duty. One party argues that since liquor is not excisable under the Central Excise Tariff, the distillery is not liable for Central Excise Duty on the bottles. Another viewpoint suggests that Central Excise Authorities require payment of duties on manufacturing and captive use, recommending registration under the Central Excise Act, 1944. A third opinion concurs, noting that the presence of company logos on bottles necessitates excise duty payment, advising registration to avoid litigation. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues