Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Dealers legal Requirment

MUNIRAJ SRINIVASAN

My client has import of Plastic Role under chapter 3910  after payment of customs, CVD, and SAD duty  and  cutting of plastic rolls as per customer requirement is amounting to manufacturer and he has to pay manufacturing duty or not whether dealer RC is enough

Does Cutting Imported Plastic Rolls Qualify as Manufacturing Under Section 2f(iii) and Schedule 3 of the Tariff Act? A client inquired about whether cutting imported plastic rolls under chapter 3910, after paying customs, CVD, and SAD duties, constitutes manufacturing, thus requiring manufacturing duty payment. Two responses were provided. One suggested reviewing Section 2f(iii) and Schedule 3 of the Tariff Act and a Supreme Court judgment. The other outlined that for a process to be considered manufacturing under excise rules, it must transform inputs into a new product with a distinct name, character, and use. Relevant case laws, including Kores India Ltd, Prachi Industries, and Arihant Tiles and Marbles, were cited to determine if the process qualifies as manufacturing. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
YAGAY andSUN on Jul 11, 2013

Please check the Section 2f(iii) and Schedule 3 of the Tariff act along with the Supreme Court's judgment in S.R. Foil matter.

R MUTHURAJ on Jul 12, 2013

 

The following inputs which may be useful to you.

As per Excise rules, in respect of the manufacturing process, 
- There should be inputs (raw materials)
- They should be subjected to processing.
- As a result a new product quite different from the inputs should be obtained.
- The Finished Product must have a distinct Name, Character and Usage quite different from the inputs. 

Refer to the case laws to check whether the said process amount to manufacture or not:

Case Law referred:

1. Kores India Ltd  (2004 (11) TMI 107 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) =(2004) 174 ELT 7(SC)

Type writer / Telex ribbons in jumbo rolls of more than 200 metres length are cut into standard lengths of 10 metres or 5 metres, wound in spools and sold as ribbon in spools for use in typewriter. Ribbon in jumbo rolls can not be used in type writer. Ribbon in spool is a distinct identifiable article having distint name, function and use. Therefore the said process is manufacture.
 
2. Prachi Industries  (2008 (3) TMI 25 - Supreme court) = (2008) 225 ELT 16(SC)

Swaging on duty paid MS tube / Pipe amounts to manufacture. Because after undergoing swaging process a workpiece of different shape and use emerges. By the use of dies and presses distinguishable identity of lasting character is imparted to a plane MS Pipe / tube.

3. Arihant Tiles and Marbles P Ltd  (2009 (12) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT)= (2010) 249 ELT 161(SC) Income Tax Case

Sawing of marble blocks into slabs and tiles and polishing them amount to manufacturing.

Regards

R.Muthuraj

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues