Just a moment...

Top
Help
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Disallowance of fixed asset

A RAVINDRA

If a fixed asset worth say 250000/- is purchased by cash payment, will the depreciation be disallwed on the ground that the asset is procured through cash payment exceeding Rs 20000/-. Please clarify

Depreciation on Rs. 250,000 asset in cash challenged under Section 40A(3); consider Rule 6DD exceptions, avoid cash deals. A query was raised regarding the disallowance of depreciation on a fixed asset purchased for Rs. 250,000 in cash, exceeding the Rs. 20,000 limit under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. Respondents generally advised that depreciation should not be disallowed as it is a statutory allowance for assets used in business, not an 'expenditure' as per the Profit & Loss account. However, there is a risk of litigation, and it is recommended to avoid cash transactions. Rule 6DD exceptions and relevant case laws may support the claim for depreciation despite the cash payment. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
DEV KUMAR KOTHARI on Jan 10, 2009

Cost of assets purchased is not 'any expenditure', which is debited in P & l a/c or claimed otherwise. Depreciastion is a statutory allowance allowable on assets owned and used for business or profession.. Therefore, S. 40A (3) shluld not be applied. However, use of words 'no deduction shall be allowed in respect of such expenditure' can embrance within itself, depreciation allowance also, if a vie wis taken that 'any expenditure' includes even capital expenditure. and depreciation is considered as a deduction i.r.o. such expenditure. So bettere to avoid cash payments.

Guest on Jan 11, 2009

The sum of Rs.250000 is not 'any expenditure'of revenue nature. It is not debited in P & l a/c. Depreciastion is allowed as per law if assets is owned and used for business or profession.Therefore, S. 40A (3) sholuld not be applied. However, use of words 'no deduction shall be allowed in respect of such expenditure' will cause litigation becasue the AO will take viee that 'any expenditure' includes even capital expenditure and depreciation being a deduction i.r.o. such expenditure, S. 40A (3) is applicable. Suggestion -avoid cash payments.

Guest on Jan 12, 2009

Let us discuss this from a logical angle while considering our argument. Generally such high value items are always advised to be transacted through acocunt payee cheque. Since in your case, the asset is procurred through cash payment exceeding Rs 20,000, you are exposed to the risk of attracting the provisions of sec 40A (3) unless you can justify for the circumstances necessitating the payment otherwise than by account payee cheque. You may refer to Rule 6DD for the cases and circumstances for no disallowance. Since the amount paid would be disallowed not allowing it as an expense,you can argue that the amount otherwise is being treated as 'capital item' and hence the depreciation on the amount capitalised can be argued to be sustainable. You can refer case laws for the same. The reasoning you may adopt is suppose hypothetically,in the year you claim business having commenced commercially, hence the loss should be allowed as a business loss, but suppose assessing officer disagrees to the same and does not allow the loss, then the expenses are capitalised on the gound of being treated as preoperative expenses.

DEV KUMAR KOTHARI on Jan 14, 2009
The purchase is of fixed asset of Rs.2,50,000/- it may be very difficult to establish bonafides for exceptional circumstances for payment in cash. Suppose you made payment on a Sunday- question will arise why payment was not made earlier or later. If there is no bank at delivery place, the question can be raised why payment could not be made when the venodr has bank account (most likely) at some other place, urgency of cash payment or non acceptance of cheque/ DD payment is also difficult to establish in such cases. So better to make payment by A/c payee cheque or DD.
SUNILKUMAR GUPTA on Jan 30, 2009
No . Depreciation will not be disallowed. Because Rule 6DD does not apply to purchase of Fixed Assets. Hence you can buy fixed assets in cash without any limit and claim depreciation.
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues