Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Income-tax Officers urged to examine past records to prevent omission of share income, initiate penalties per Section 271(1)(c).</h1> The circular addresses a case where an Income-tax Officer failed to identify a partner's omission to declare share income from a firm, leading to a reassessment and penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It emphasizes the need for assessing officers to examine previous assessment records to avoid such oversights. The circular instructs officers to be vigilant and initiate penalty proceedings if similar omissions are detected, ensuring compliance with tax obligations. These instructions are to be communicated to all Income-tax Officers to prevent future errors.