Random selection for scrutiny mandated with income slab sampling tiers, supervisory responsibility and annual reporting requirement. Random selection for tax scrutiny must follow prescribed percentage-based sampling by income slabs, with a higher sampling rate for newly detected or voluntary summary-assessment cases at the lowest income tier. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner is personally responsible for making selections and ensuring compliance with existing procedural guidelines. Commissioners must enforce the system, ensure random selection numbers reach ITOs, and submit an annual report to the Board by August 15 showing the number of cases selected by random sampling.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Random selection for scrutiny mandated with income slab sampling tiers, supervisory responsibility and annual reporting requirement.
Random selection for tax scrutiny must follow prescribed percentage-based sampling by income slabs, with a higher sampling rate for newly detected or voluntary summary-assessment cases at the lowest income tier. The Inspecting Assistant Commissioner is personally responsible for making selections and ensuring compliance with existing procedural guidelines. Commissioners must enforce the system, ensure random selection numbers reach ITOs, and submit an annual report to the Board by August 15 showing the number of cases selected by random sampling.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.