Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Rajasthan GST Act: Fake Invoices Not 'Supply,' Penalties u/ss 122, 74 for Issuers and Recipients.</h1> The circular addresses the misuse of fake invoices under the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It clarifies that when a registered person issues a tax invoice without an actual supply of goods or services, it does not constitute a 'supply' under the Act, and thus no tax liability arises. However, the issuer is liable for penalties under section 122. If a recipient fraudulently avails input tax credit (ITC) based on such invoices, they face demand, recovery, and penalties under section 74. Further, if the recipient passes on such fraudulent ITC, they are also subject to penalties under sections 122(1)(ii) and 122(1)(vii).