Unjust enrichment: refunds cannot be denied solely because claimant may receive fortuitous benefit; claims to be adjudicated per law. The Board reiterates that authorities lack any statutory power under the Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 or rules to reject refund claims merely because allowing the refund would give a fortuitous benefit or undue enrichment to the manufacturer; pending refund cases must be decided in line with the earlier instruction dated 10-8-1981 and related telexes.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Unjust enrichment: refunds cannot be denied solely because claimant may receive fortuitous benefit; claims to be adjudicated per law.
The Board reiterates that authorities lack any statutory power under the Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 or rules to reject refund claims merely because allowing the refund would give a fortuitous benefit or undue enrichment to the manufacturer; pending refund cases must be decided in line with the earlier instruction dated 10-8-1981 and related telexes.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.