Registration deficiency: Failure to seek revocation of a cancelled GST registration can justify rejection of a fresh application. Proper officers must compare FORM GST REG-01 details with prior registrations on the common portal to detect concealment. If a prior registration on the same PAN was cancelled under the conditions in clauses (b) and (c) of sub section (2) of section 29 and the applicant has not applied for revocation while those conditions persist, that failure is a 'deficiency' under rule 9(2) and may justify rejection of the fresh registration under rule 9 read with rule 9(4). Absent convincing justification, the application may be rejected.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Registration deficiency: Failure to seek revocation of a cancelled GST registration can justify rejection of a fresh application.
Proper officers must compare FORM GST REG-01 details with prior registrations on the common portal to detect concealment. If a prior registration on the same PAN was cancelled under the conditions in clauses (b) and (c) of sub section (2) of section 29 and the applicant has not applied for revocation while those conditions persist, that failure is a "deficiency" under rule 9(2) and may justify rejection of the fresh registration under rule 9 read with rule 9(4). Absent convincing justification, the application may be rejected.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.