Investor grievance redressal reforms mandate arbitrator transparency, empanelment separation, increased fees and interim relief rules and database for defaulters. Amendments require exchanges to enhance arbitration transparency by publishing arbitrator profiles, permit electronic document submissions, conduct annual arbitrator reviews with NISM training funded from ISF, maintain a common defaulter database, separate arbitration and appellate panels with a retired judge on appellate panels and SEBI approval for empanelment, revise arbitrator fees and a structured filing-fee regime with deposits and refunds, permit metro venue for higher-value proceedings at appellant's cost, align award interest with the Arbitration Amendment Act, and set staged interim relief releases from IPF subject to a yearly cap.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Investor grievance redressal reforms mandate arbitrator transparency, empanelment separation, increased fees and interim relief rules and database for defaulters.
Amendments require exchanges to enhance arbitration transparency by publishing arbitrator profiles, permit electronic document submissions, conduct annual arbitrator reviews with NISM training funded from ISF, maintain a common defaulter database, separate arbitration and appellate panels with a retired judge on appellate panels and SEBI approval for empanelment, revise arbitrator fees and a structured filing-fee regime with deposits and refunds, permit metro venue for higher-value proceedings at appellant's cost, align award interest with the Arbitration Amendment Act, and set staged interim relief releases from IPF subject to a yearly cap.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.