Caveat filing ensures departmental notice and prompt counter-affidavit processing for SLPs filed by taxpayers in the Supreme Court. The procedure requires the CIT to decide on filing a caveat after a High Court order, submit a reasoned proposal to the Legal & Research Directorate, transmit vakalatnama to obtain SLP records, furnish para-wise comments to DIT(L&R), and follow a coordinated drafting, vetting and signing process for the counter affidavit through AoR/CAS, with monitoring of the Supreme Court cause-list and adherence to prescribed timelines and reporting responsibilities.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Caveat filing ensures departmental notice and prompt counter-affidavit processing for SLPs filed by taxpayers in the Supreme Court.
The procedure requires the CIT to decide on filing a caveat after a High Court order, submit a reasoned proposal to the Legal & Research Directorate, transmit vakalatnama to obtain SLP records, furnish para-wise comments to DIT(L&R), and follow a coordinated drafting, vetting and signing process for the counter affidavit through AoR/CAS, with monitoring of the Supreme Court cause-list and adherence to prescribed timelines and reporting responsibilities.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.